Retrospective review reveals head circumference growth impacts ETV success in children with posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus, indicating shunt dependency risks.
The timing and indications for endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) in pediatric hydrocephalus are debated. We evaluated head circumference growth as a predictor of ETV success in children with posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH). We conducted a retrospective review of 303 patients who underwent ETV from 2012 to 2021, focusing on those with intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and PHH. Data were collected from electronic medical records. A univariate logistic regression analyzed predictors of ETV failure, with head circumference growth rate calculated from preoperative occipito-frontal circumference measurements. Among the 303 patients, 24 had IVH and PHH. Mean gestational age was 30 weeks, with 58% male, and a mean weight of 4.48 kg at surgery. Notably, 96% (n = 23) had choroid plexus cauterization, and 46% (n = 11) underwent ventriculosubgaleal shunt. Of the 24, 67% (n = 16) required eventual ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement, indicating ETV failure. Corrected age at ETV was younger in the failure group (0.69 months) than in the success group (2.56 months, p = 0.020, odds ratio [OR]: 1.04). Mean weight at surgery was lower for the failure group (3.85 kg vs. 5.75 kg, p = 0.036). Duration of preoperative surveillance was 1.94 months for the failure group and 5.25 months for the success group (p = 0.004). Head circumference growth rate was 1.57 mm/day in the failure group compared to 0.85 mm/day in the success group (p = 0.009, OR: 39.9). Younger corrected age, lower weight at surgery, shorter preoperative surveillance time, and faster head circumference growth rate were associated with ETV failure and ultimately VPS placement. Further analysis with a larger cohort may enhance predictions of ETV success rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shahin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: