External validation shows S-GRAS score predicts recurrence in adrenocortical carcinoma, suggesting mitotane therapy may benefit high-risk patients.
Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare, aggressive malignancy with variable outcomes post-adrenalectomy. The S-GRAS score integrates five clinical and pathological factors to predict prognosis but requires external validation in diverse settings. We validated the S-GRAS score in 138 ACC patients from the Spanish ICARO-GETTHI/SEEN registry (1998-2023). Model performance was assessed using discrimination, calibration, and accuracy. Exploratory refinements included nonlinear modeling of age and Ki-67% and an expanded model incorporating venous invasion and tumor size. Cox models examined the interaction between S-GRAS and adjuvant mitotane. A total of 76 recurrence events were recorded. The S-GRAS score demonstrated good discrimination for overall survival (C-index 0.706, 95% CI: 0.628-0.785) and recurrence-free survival (C-index 0.673, 95% CI: 0.601-0.745) with well-calibrated predictions. Five-year survival rates differed significantly across score groups: 100% for scores 0-1, 81.6% for 2-3, 55% for 4-5, and 33.8% for 6-7. Nonlinear modeling of Ki-67% improved performance (C-index 0.738 for RFS, 0.761 for OS), but adding clinical variables offered minimal benefit, leaving 75% of recurrence variability unexplained. Higher S-GRAS scores correlated with increased mitotane benefit (HR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.34-0.97 for score 4; HR 0.46, 95% CI: 0.23-0.94 for score 5), indicating a potential incremental benefit pattern. Our findings validate the S-GRAS score in a multicenter cohort and support its use in identifying candidates for adjuvant mitotane. Nonlinear modeling of Ki-67% enhances predictive precision without increasing complexity, but the performance plateau of clinical variables suggests that integrating molecular biomarkers may be necessary to improve prognostic accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carmona‐Bayonas et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: