Key result
Combining S-GRAS score and NLR yields superior overall survival prediction with a ~0.82 C-index.
Why the study?
This study aimed to assess the prognostic values of the S-GRAS model, NLR, and PLR, and to characterise the potential interaction between them in adrenocortical carcinoma.
Does the combination of S-GRAS score and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) improve prognostic discrimination for survival in adult patients with adrenocortical carcinoma?
Cohort (n=67)
No
Does the combination of S-GRAS score and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) improve prognostic discrimination for survival in adult patients with adrenocortical carcinoma?
Hazard Ratio: 1.207 (95% CI 1.075–1.356)
p-value: p=<0.001
The combination of the S-GRAS score and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio provides superior prognostic discrimination for survival in patients with adrenocortical carcinoma.
Should not yet alter prognostication in adrenocortical carcinoma; leaves open validation of combined S-GRAS-NLR utility in prospective cohorts.
Introduction This study aimed to assess the prognostic values of the S-GRAS model and two of the most frequently used inflammation-based scores – neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) – and to characterise the potential interaction between the two measures. Patients and methods In this single-centre, retrospective, observational cohort analysis, 67 adult patients with histologically confirmed adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) were analysed. The S-GRAS score and the inflammation-based markers were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank tests, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regressions. Discriminative ability was assessed using Harrell’s C-index, later compared with likelihood ratio tests. An interaction analysis was conducted by constructing a multivariate regression with mean-centred variables and their interaction term. Results External validation on the S-GRAS scoring system demonstrated the superior discriminative ability of the model (C-index=0.765) compared to its constituents. Our sub-analysis on 42 patients identified NLR as a significant predictor of mortality (HR = 3.1; p=0.008), whilst PLR failed to reach statistical significance. Our interaction analysis revealed a significant synergistic interaction between S-GRAS and NLR (HR = 1.177, p=0.009). While both S-GRAS (C-index=0.803) and NLR (C-index=0.722) was found to be a significant predictor of survival, their joint application demonstrated superior prognostic discrimination (C-index=0.822) over their individual use (p=0.006 and p<0.001). Conclusions NLR provides independent and complementary predictive value to the well-established S-GRAS score, and their combination offers superior discrimination over each marker alone. A synergistic interaction between the two metrics is the most prominent in high-risk patient groups. External validation confirms the prognostic robustness of the S-GRAS score.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bényei et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) (n=67). S-GRAS score and Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) vs. Lower S-GRAS scores and lower NLR was evaluated on Overall survival (multivariate model for NLR) (HR 1.207, 95% CI 1.075-1.356, p=<0.001). The joint application of the S-GRAS score and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio demonstrated superior prognostic discrimination for overall survival (C-index 0.822) with a significant synergistic interaction (HR 1.177).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: