This study investigated radiologists' perceptions of AI-generated, patient-friendly radiology reports across three modalities: MRI, CT, and mammogram/ultrasound. The evaluation focused on report correctness, completeness, terminology complexity, and emotional impact. Seventy-nine radiologists from four major Saudi Arabian hospitals assessed AI-simplified versions of clinical radiology reports. Each participant reviewed one report from each modality and completed a structured questionnaire covering factual correctness, completeness, terminology complexity, and emotional impact. A structured and detailed prompt was used to guide ChatGPT-4 in generating the reports, which included clear findings, a lay summary, glossary, and clarification of ambiguous elements. Statistical analyses included descriptive summaries, Friedman tests, and Pearson correlations. Radiologists rated mammogram reports highest for correctness (M = 4.22), followed by CT (4.05) and MRI (3.95). Completeness scores followed a similar trend. Statistically significant differences were found in correctness (χ2(2) = 17.37, p < 0.001) and completeness (χ2(2) = 13.13, p = 0.001). Anxiety and complexity ratings were moderate, with MRI reports linked to slightly higher concern. A weak positive correlation emerged between radiologists' experience and mammogram correctness ratings (r = .235, p = .037). Radiologists expressed overall support for AI-generated simplified radiology reports when created using a structured prompt that includes summaries, glossaries, and clarification of ambiguous findings. While mammography and CT reports were rated favorably, MRI reports showed higher emotional impact, highlighting a need for clearer and more emotionally supportive language.
Mohammad Alarifi (Wed,) studied this question.