Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study shows no increased risk of postoperative junctional rhythm using the superior septal approach in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.
The superior septal approach offers improved mitral valve exposure compared to the right-sided left atriotomy or transseptal approach. However, the risk of postoperative sinus node dysfunction remains controversial, with limited data in the context of right mini-thoracotomy. This retrospective study included 155 patients (64 women; mean age, 60.8 ± 13.4 years) who underwent mitral valve surgery via right mini-thoracotomy between November 2016 and August 2023. Indications included degenerative mitral regurgitation (94.8%) and mitral stenosis (5.2%). Patients were divided into 2 groups: the conventional minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (CM) group (n = 47), using the right-sided left atriotomy, and the drawer-case technique (DCT) group (n = 108), using the superior septal approach. Demographic, intraoperative, and outcome data were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. There were no significant differences in valve repair techniques or postoperative echocardiographic findings. Postoperative junctional rhythm occurred in 6 patients (CM group) and 21 patients (DCT group); all patients with preoperative sinus rhythm returned to sinus rhythm postoperatively. The superior septal approach does not increase the risk of persistent junctional rhythm in right mini-thoracotomy and is a safe and effective option for mitral valve surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamazaki et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: