Application of qPCR for assessing fecal contamination sources in West Java, indicating significant seasonal variations.
The analysis of host-associated microorganisms by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) has long been widely applied as a microbial source tracking (MST) tool for identifying the sources of fecal contamination. Although numerous studies have been conducted across Asia, relevant research on Indonesia is scarce. In this study, we evaluated the performance of various human- and animal-specific MST markers and applied the results to the assessment of the water quality of a river in West Java, Indonesia. Fecal samples from seven animal species (n = 43), sewage samples (n = 7), and river water samples (n = 48) were collected from eight locations along a river in West Java from August to September 2023 (dry season) and February to March 2024 (wet season). Among the 16 host-specific MST markers tested using qPCR, the detection ratio of human-specific markers in the target samples showed considerable variation (43%-100%). Ruminant-specific markers, including bacterial (BacCow and BacR) and mitochondrial DNA (Bovine-mtDNA) markers, demonstrated a 100% detection ratio in their target samples. In the nontarget samples, the positive ratio of MST markers varied widely from 0% (AiV-1) to 81% (BacCow). CrAssphage and Bovine-mtDNA were identified as the most effective MST markers specific to humans and ruminants, respectively. pBI143, as a newly established human-specific marker, demonstrated commendable performance with 100% sensitivity and 77% specificity. This study confirmed the presence of MST markers in the river water, with a positive ratio of 38% for Bovine-mtDNA and 67% for CrAssphage during the dry season; the values increased during the wet season to 54% and 88%, respectively. The results emphasize the importance of using several types of MST markers to obtain comprehensive results and insight into contamination patterns, as well as the necessity for further research across diverse sub-watersheds and other water sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruti et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: