Psychometric evaluation of WORC-TC in patients with rotator cuff tears, highlighting its reliability and validity.
Translate the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Index into Traditional Chinese (WORC-TC), validate its psychometric properties, and adapt it to rotator cuff tears (RCTs) in patients who only understand Traditional Chinese. Translation and psychometric validation were performed. A total of 210 patients completed the WORC-TC, Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and State Anger Scale (SAS) questionnaires. Construct validity and internal consistency were evaluated. Test-retest reliability analyses were conducted on a 30-patient sub-sample. The translation and linguistic validation process modified one item. Exploratory factor analysis identified a four-factor structure explaining 66.132% variance. The WORC-TC demonstrated convergent validity with QuickDASH (r = 0.834, p < 0.001), NPRS (r = 0.754, p < 0.001), and SF-12 (r = -0.702, p < 0.001), and divergent validity with the SAS (r = 0.286, p < 0.001). Known-group validity was confirmed, with significant differences between high- and low-pain groups (p < 0.001). The WORC-TC showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.94) and good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.79). The WORC-TC can reliably evaluate quality of life in patients with RCTs who exclusively use Traditional Chinese.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: