Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Proposed improved PAM model demonstrates higher accuracy in biomass estimation for soybean and cotton, suggesting its wider applicability.
Most crops accumulate above-ground biomass (AGB) through photosynthesis, inspiring the development of the Photosynthetic Accumulation Model (PAM) and Simplified PAM (SPAM). Both models estimate AGB based on time-series optical vegetation indices (VIs) and canopy height. To further enhance the model performance and evaluate its applicability across different crop types, an improved PAM model (IPAM) is proposed with three strategies. They are as follows: (i) using numerical integration to reduce reliance on dense observations, (ii) introduction of Fibonacci sequence-based structural correction to improve model accuracy, and (iii) non-photosynthetic area masking to reduce overestimation. Results from both soybean and cotton demonstrate the strong performance of the PAM-series models. Among them, the proposed IPAM model achieved higher accuracy, with mean R2 and RMSE values of 0.89 and 207 g/m2 for soybean and 0.84 and 251 g/m2 for cotton, respectively. Among the vegetation indices tested, the recently proposed Near-Infrared Reflectance of vegetation (NIRv) and Kernel-based normalized difference vegetation index (Kndvi) yielded the most accurate results. Both Monte Carlo simulations and theoretical error propagation analyses indicate a maximum deviation percentage of approximately 20% for both crops, which is considered acceptable given the expected inter-annual variation in model transferability. In addition, this paper discusses alternatives to height measurements and evaluates the feasibility of incorporating synthetic aperture radar (SAR) VIs, providing practical insights into the model’s adaptability across diverse data conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: