Observational study shows wave mixing influences chlorophyll dynamics in phytoplankton blooms, suggesting model improvements are needed.
The spring bloom is an annual event in temperate regions of the North Atlantic Ocean in which the abundance of photosynthetic plankton increases dramatically. The timing and intensity of the spring bloom is dependent on underlying physical conditions that control ocean stratification and mixing. Although waves can be an important source of turbulent kinetic energy to the surface mixed layer, they have seldom been considered explicitly in studies of bloom formation. Here, we investigate the role of surface waves in bloom formation using a combination of satellite observations and numerical models. Satellite observations show a positive correlation between wave activity and chlorophyll concentration in the Northwest European shelf (May–September). In the deeper Northeast Atlantic, increased wave activity correlates with lower chlorophyll during periods of high phytoplankton activity (March–May) and higher chlorophyll when activity is low (below 54° N, July–September). We use a first-of-its-kind, km-scale, two-way coupled model system to investigate both the relationship between wave mixing and bloom formation, and the sensitivity of model results to the method by which wave mixing is parameterised. In deep regions, during the spring bloom, a wave mixing event is likely to mix surface chlorophyll to deeper layers, away from light. In contrast, when and where phytoplankton activity is low in deep regions, wave mixing can entrain nutrients, fueling the growth of nutrient starved phytoplankton near the surface. In June to October, in shallow but weakly stratified regions of the shelf, surface chlorophyll tends to be elevated following a wave mixing event, which can bring to the surface both phytoplankton from deeper layers and nutrients. When contrasted with ocean only runs, the two way-coupled ocean-wave model tends to produce greater vertical mixing and a delay in bloom onset. These results indicate bloom dynamics are sensitive to the way in which waves are modelled, and that the role of waves in bloom formation should be considered in future studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Partridge et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: