Retrospective survey found molecular techniques improve pathogen identification in lower respiratory tract samples, suggesting a shift from traditional methods.
The current gold standard for clinical pathogen identification relies on a combination of culture-based methods, target-specific molecular techniques, and antigen-detection assays 1. Known limitations of the first method include the requirement for viable and culturable microorganisms, while the second approach is constrained to a limited number of predefined targets. These constraints reduce their diagnostic success, as not all pathogens are culturable, easily isolated from the commensal microbiota, or represented in the selected detection panels. While culture-based methods are widely recognized for their limited sensitivity, updated quantifications of their actual performance in real-world clinical settings are scarce. To address this gap, we conducted a retrospective survey of all lower respiratory tract (LRT) samples processed by either culture or target-based molecular methods over a five-year period at a Portuguese hospital centre, providing a quantitative assessment of current diagnostic performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodrigues et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: