Commentary reveals harmful changes to public participation and judicial review in infrastructure planning.
The Planning and Infrastructure Bill aims to speed up the planning process and associated decision-making. Part 1 of the Bill introduces changes in the context of Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIPs) that warrant attention. First, the Bill removes the legal duty to consult at the pre-application stage of the NSIP development consent process. In particular it removes the public's legal right to participate at this stage. Second, it makes changes to the judicial review process which raise questions over the balance between the swift administration of justice and access to justice. This commentary argues that combined the proposed reforms reflect a move that supports a rhetoric of ‘challenge culture’. 1 This rhetoric positions procedural and administrative law as an obstacle to infrastructure development and is something we should not ignore.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joanne Hawkins (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: