Randomised controlled trial compares raw honey to saline dressing for ulcer healing in leprosy, suggesting honey may be a safe option.
Introduction Chronic neuropathic ulcers remain a debilitating complication of leprosy, with limited evidence for effective treatments. Honey has been recommended to promote wound healing in other chronic ulcers. However, its efficacy in leprosy-related ulcers has not been rigorously evaluated. Methods This dual-centre, prospective, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial compared raw honey dressings (n=65) versus standard saline dressings (n=65) for leprosy-associated foot ulcers in Nigeria. Participants with ulcers (2-20 cm2, ≥6 weeks duration) were randomised 1:1, stratified by ulcer size. Primary outcomes were complete healing by 84 days and healing rate, assessed through blinded digital planimetry. Secondary outcomes included ulcer recurrence and/or new ulcer development at 6 months. A total of 130 participants were randomised in the study. Results Complete healing occurred in 29.2% of honey-treated ulcers versus 24.6% with saline (adjusted HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.64-2.47). At 6 months, recurrence rates were similar (honey 13.5% vs saline 10.2%). The honey group showed a non-significant trend toward faster healing (p=0.076). No treatment-related adverse events occurred. Conclusion While honey dressings showed a modest advantage in healing rate, the difference was not statistically significant. The results suggest honey may be a safe, culturally acceptable option in resource-limited settings, but larger trials are needed to confirm efficacy. This study provides crucial baseline data for future research on alternative therapies for leprosy ulcers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsaku et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: