Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals varied public interest in AV adoption between burdened and non-burdened communities, suggesting tailored policies.
This study examines differences in public interest toward automated vehicle (AV) adoption between burdened communities (BCs) and non-burdened communities (non-BCs). The study uniquely captures travel behavior by integrating the census tract-level community indicators with the 2017–2019 Puget Sound Household Travel Survey. Public interest in AV ownership is modeled as a five-level ordered outcome, ranging from 'Not interested at all' to 'Very interested.' Segmented ordered logit models and Random Forest are used to identify key drivers and barriers to AV adoption across BCs and non-BCs. Results show that longer commute times, lack of personal vehicles, and concerns about AV performance in adverse weather conditions are significantly associated with higher interest levels toward owning AVs in BCs. The findings offer insights for developing targeted policies to promote AV adoption and address differences between BCs and non-BCs in accessing emerging transportation technologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Usman et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: