Analysis reveals distinct co2 fluxes in wetland types across China, suggesting climatic impacts on carbon exchange.
Wetlands play a critical role in modulating the global carbon cycle and significantly contribute to climate change mitigation. China’s wetlands are characterized by high diversity, a large total area, wide distribution, and strong regional variability. However, the carbon exchange dynamics across different wetland types and their controlling mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here, we quantified and compared CO2 fluxes (gross primary productivity (GPP), ecosystem respiration (ER), and net ecosystem productivity (NEP)) among China’s wetland types using eddy covariance measurements, analyzing spatial patterns and controlling mechanisms. Coastal wetlands exhibited higher annual GPP, ER, and NEP compared with inland wetlands. Among all wetland types, mangrove ecosystems had the highest carbon uptake capacity. The carbon conversion efficiency (CCE) of inland wetlands (0.89 ± 0.24) was higher than that of coastal wetlands (0.66 ± 0.12), suggesting that inland wetlands are less efficient at carbon fixation than coastal wetlands. However, due to their larger total area than that of coastal wetlands, inland wetlands in China likely constitute a greater overall CO2 sink. Spatially, GPP and NEP showed significant differences between the tropical/subtropical zones and the temperate/plateau zones (p < 0.05), indicating the influence of climatic conditions. Climate factors influenced carbon fluxes primarily through their regulation of vegetation and soil features. The cascading relationships among climate, vegetation, and soil, as revealed by structural equation modeling (SEM), explained 61–71% of the spatial variation in GPP and ER, and 68% in NEP. Our findings provide valuable theoretical insights into the role of China’s wetland ecosystem in the global carbon cycle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Du et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: