Performance assessment reveals current-feedback methods improve stability and reduce harmonic distortion in grid-connected VSCs.
The voltage source converters convert the DC to AC in order to interface distributed generation units with the utility grid, typically using an LCL filter to smooth the modulated wave. However, the LCL filter can introduce resonance, potentially cause instability, and necessitate the use of damping techniques, such as active damping, which utilizes feedback from the current control loop to suppress resonance. This paper presents a comprehensive performance assessment of four current-feedback-based active damping (AD) techniques—converter current feedback (CCF), CCF with capacitor current feedback (CCFAD), grid current feedback (GCF), and GCF with capacitor current feedback (GCFAD)—under a broad range of realistic grid disturbances and low switching frequency conditions. Unlike prior works that often analyze individual feedback strategies in isolation, this study highlights and compares their dynamic behavior, robustness, and total harmonic distortion (THD) in eight operational scenarios. The results reveal the severe instability of GCF in the absence of damping and the superior inherent damping property of CCF while demonstrating the comparable effectiveness of GCFAD. Moreover, a simplified yet robust design methodology for the LCL filter is proposed, enabling the filter to maintain stability and performance even under significant variations in grid impedance. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis of switching frequency variation is included. The findings offer valuable insights into selecting and implementing robust active damping methods for grid-connected converters operating at constrained switching frequencies. The effectiveness of the proposed methods has been validated through both MATLAB/Simulink simulations and hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ali et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: