Analysis reveals ERA5 underestimates wind speeds in high-altitude regions, indicating significant regional variations.
Accurate surface wind speed data are vital for atmospheric science, climatology, and energy applications. European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis v.5 (ERA5), as one of the most widely used global reanalysis datasets, has insufficient assessment of its applicability across diverse landform types. Using the gridded observational dataset over China (CN05.1) and the Global Basic Landform Units dataset, this study evaluated the surface wind speed data from ERA5 over various altitudinal zones and undulating terrains in China via root-mean-square differences (RMSD) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) against CN05.1 observations. Results reveal significant regional variations, with ERA5 effectively capturing the spatial distribution of mean wind speeds but systematically underestimating magnitudes, particularly in plateau and mountainous regions. ERA5 reanalysis fails to reproduce the observed altitudinal increase in surface wind speed. Elevation-dependent biases are prominent, with RMSD and MAPE increasing from low-altitude to high-altitude areas. Terrain complexity exacerbates errors, showing maximum deviations in high-relief mountains and minimum deviations in hilly regions. These biases evolve seasonally, peaking in spring and reaching minima in winter. In summary, discrepancies between observations and ERA5 vary with altitude, topographic relief, and season. The most significant deviations occur for spring surface winds in high-altitude, high-relief mountains, with mean RMSD reaching 3.3 m/s and MAPE 553%. The findings highlight the limitations of ERA5 reanalysis data in scientific and operational contexts over complex terrains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zuo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: