A narrative review of the impact of anthropogenic light and noise on owls

Today, owls are exposed to increasingly brightly lit nights and noisy environments because of human activities. To understand the impacts of artificial light at night (ALAN) and anthropogenic noise we performed an evidence synthesis. We searched four literature databases and Google Scholar and we collected 39 relevant articles (1945–2024) providing 125 cases (64 on light pollution and 61 on noise pollution), targeting 25 species (c. 10% of owl species). We found harmful effects of both sensory pollutants on several outcomes. First, ALAN tends to reduce acoustic communication and to be associated with a lower occurrence of owl species, although it is difficult to confirm whether ALAN leads to silent or absent owls. Moreover, ALAN disturbs owl–prey interactions. Although light probably improves owl vision, the light‐avoidance behaviour of small mammals could result in poorer hunting success of owls feeding on mammals. Conversely, ALAN enhances food provisioning and even breeding of owls feeding on insects that are attracted by light, to the detriment of these prey populations. Second, human‐induced noise clearly tends to reduce owl vocalization, yet that vocalization may be essential to communication between individuals. The ability of owls to detect prey (hunting success) is also reduced under noise exposure (even at low amplitude), probably as the result of masking and distraction. Studies also demonstrate that anthropogenic noise can cause physiological and behavioural stress and disturbance to owls. Such adverse effects may contribute to declines in reproduction and occurrence of owls observed in noisy areas. As a result, we recommend reduction of both sensory stressors as much as possible, for owls and for ecosystem stability, for example by maintaining and restoring quiet and dark areas. We also recommend more consideration of owls in sensory ecology research to fill knowledge gaps.