Comprehensive review details preoperative considerations and management of complications in robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy, highlighting the importance of patient selection and intraoperative decision making.
Background/objectives: Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is increasingly utilised for the management of renal masses, with the growing use of different robotic platforms and increasing complexity of renal masses managed robotically. Appropriate patient selection, the development of operative skills and experience and sensible surgical decision making are required to optimise the outcomes of RAPN and minimise the risk of complications. We provide a comprehensive review of strategies to predict, avoid and manage the complications of RAPN. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature review to outline many of the reported complications arising from RAPN, with a focus on preoperative considerations (patient selection, imaging, 3D modelling and predictive models), intraoperative considerations (positioning and kidney exposure complications) and practical management strategies to identify and manage the complications of this procedure. Results: Many complications of RAPN can be predicted, and we outline strategies to mitigate these risks through careful preparation prior to surgery, including descriptions of preventative strategies and important preoperative considerations. We also present a detailed outline of management for the most common complications of RAPN, including bleeding/haemorrhage, urine leak and intraoperative complications such as adjacent organ injuries. Conclusions: RAPN can be a challenging procedure with a significant risk of complications. Assiduous preoperative planning, thoughtful intraoperative decision making and the early recognition and management of complications are essential to optimise patient outcomes following RAPN.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shepherd et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: