Qualitative analysis reveals how poultry value chain finance influences sustainable practices in Zimbabwe, indicating key improvements are needed.
Abstract As environmental concerns grow in agri-food systems, this study investigates how Poultry Value Chain Finance (VCF) supports environmental sustainability in Zimbabwe. It examines stakeholder perceptions of VCF's role in promoting sustainable poultry farming practices. Using a qualitative approach, nine participants- including broiler and layer farmers, representatives from public institutions, and poultry association officials- were purposively selected and interviewed through semi-structured protocols. Thematic analysis identified key patterns and differing views on VCF’s environmental effects. Results show VCF can promote sustainable practices like waste management and renewable energy use, but these benefits depend on funding arrangements, training, and regulatory support. Most stakeholders see VCF as mainly production-focused, with limited emphasis on environmental outcomes unless linked to specific loan conditions or external incentives. The findings have practical and policy implications, emphasising the importance of incorporating environmental criteria and training into poultry financing. This study makes two major contributions: creating a conceptual framework connecting VCF, mediators, moderators, and sustainability results, and expanding the discourse on value chain finance by applying Institutional Theory to address sustainability gaps in the poultry sector.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ngwenya et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: