Experiments demonstrate sorting of stimuli in participants based on matching-to-sample training, indicating stimulus categorization is possible even without direct engagement.
The primary purpose of the present series of experiments, which includes a total of 155 adult participants, was to determine whether participants observing matching-to-sample (MTS) training and testing only sort stimuli according to experimenter-defined classes. Pooling the results of all four experiments, more than 50% of the participants sorted the stimuli according to experimenter-defined classes with no direct contact with the contingencies in the matching-to-sample training and testing. There was no substantial difference in the outcomes between participants who received a full session of MTS training and testing and those who received a 12-min video clip with training and testing (Experiments 1 and 2). However, the sorting performance was influenced by the ratio of correct responses in the observed MTS training (Experiments 3 and 4). Thus, the condition with the highest ratio of correct responses (80% correct and 20% incorrect) in the MTS training had the most participants sort stimuli according to the experimenter-defined classes. In addition, the participants who sorted correctly also formed equivalence classes in the MTS test (Experiments 2 and 3). Finally, participants who only observed the MTS training (not the test) sorted the stimuli correctly (Experiment 4).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arntzen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: