Exploration reveals catastrophic floating point errors in numerical methods for ordinary differential equations, indicating the need for better models.
.We guide the reader on a journey through mathematical modeling and numerical analysis, emphasizing the crucial interplay of both disciplines. Targeting undergraduate students with basic knowledge of dynamical systems and numerical methods for ordinary differential equations, we explore a model from mathematical biology where numerical methods fail badly due to catastrophic floating point errors. We analyze the reasons for this behavior by studying the steady states of the model and use the theory of invariants to develop an alternative model suited for numerical simulations. Our story is intended to motivate the combining of analytical knowledge and numerical knowledge, even in those cases where the world looks fine at first sight. We have set up an online repository containing an interactive notebook with all the numerical experiments in this article to make this study fully reproducible and useful for classroom teaching.Keywordsmathematical modelingsteady statesdynamical systemsnumerical instabilityinvariantsRunge–Kutta methodsMSC codes37M0565L0665L2065P4097D40
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reisch et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: