Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized controlled trial investigates remote ischemic preconditioning's effects on arterial stiffness and endothelial function in patients with heart failure, indicating new treatment potentials.
Background/Objectives: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has increased in prevalence as the population ages and associated comorbidities increase. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been shown to provide protection against ischemic injury to the heart and other organs. Therefore, the aim of this project will be to analyse the effectiveness of RIPC in terms of arterial stiffness, endothelial function, diastolic function, and exercise capacity in patients with HFpEF. Methods: The PIRIC-FEp study will be a parallel, randomised controlled trial with two groups conducted at the Faculty of Nursing in Cuenca, University of Castilla-La Mancha. Individuals who are diagnosed with HFpEF and are older than 40 years, with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% and a sedentary lifestyle, will be included. The exclusion criteria will include, among others, patients with noncardiac causes of heart failure symptoms, significant pulmonary disease, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, or myocardial infarction within the previous three months. A sample size of 48 patients was estimated, with 24 for each group. Participants will be randomly allocated (1:1) to either the RIPC intervention group or the control group to evaluate the effects on arterial stiffness, endothelial function, diastolic function, and exercise capacity. Assessments will be conducted at baseline and after a three-month follow-up period. Results: The findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal article. Conclusions: This study is important for daily clinical practice because it provides a new approach for the treatment of HFpEF patients via RIPC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Otero-Luis et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: