Key result
Remote ischemic preconditioning fails to reduce major events vs control in major vascular surgery.
Why the study?
The effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on clinical outcomes following major vascular surgery was uncertain.
Does remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) reduce adverse clinical outcomes in patients undergoing major vascular surgery?
RCT (n=198)
randomized
Yes
Does remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) reduce adverse clinical outcomes in patients undergoing major vascular surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 14.1% vs 19.2%
p-value: p=.446
Remote ischemic preconditioning did not significantly reduce a composite of major adverse clinical outcomes following major vascular surgery in this pilot trial.
Does not support remote ischemic preconditioning in major vascular surgery; challenges earlier positive signals from smaller trials.
A pilot randomized controlled trial that evaluated the effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on clinical outcomes following major vascular surgery was performed. Eligible patients were those scheduled to undergo open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, endovascular aortic aneurysm repair, carotid endarterectomy, and lower limb revascularization procedures. Patients were randomized to RIPC or to control groups. The primary outcome was a composite clinical end point comprising any of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, new-onset arrhythmia, cardiac arrest, congestive cardiac failure, cerebrovascular accident, renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy, mesenteric ischemia, and urgent cardiac revascularization. Secondary outcomes were components of the primary outcome and myocardial injury as assessed by serum troponin values. The primary outcome occurred in 19 (19.2%) of 99 controls and 14 (14.1%) of 99 RIPC group patients (P = .446). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes. Our trial generated data that will guide future trials. Further trials are urgently needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Healy et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Major vascular surgery (n=198). Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) vs. Control was evaluated on Composite clinical end point comprising cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, new-onset arrhythmia, cardiac arrest, congestive cardiac failure, cerebrovascular accident, renal failure, mesenteric ischemia, and urgent cardiac revascularization (p=.446). Remote ischemic preconditioning did not significantly reduce the composite clinical endpoint compared to control in patients undergoing major vascular surgery (14.1% vs 19.2%, P=0.446).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: