Key result
Remote ischemic pre-conditioning cuts peri-procedural MI by ~28% and reduces MACE in elective PCI.
Why the study?
Does pre-procedural remote ischaemic pre-conditioning reduce cardiac and renal damage in patients undertaking elective percutaneous coronary intervention?
Meta-Analysis (n=1,253)
Does pre-procedural remote ischaemic pre-conditioning reduce cardiac and renal damage in patients undertaking elective percutaneous coronary intervention?
Effect estimate: OR 0.72 (95% CI 0.54-0.97)
p-value: p=0.03
Pre-procedural remote ischaemic pre-conditioning significantly reduces peri-procedural MI, MACE, and AKI in patients undergoing elective PCI.
Supports pre-procedural remote ischemic preconditioning in elective PCI; confirms MACE reduction across randomized trials.
Trials of remote ischemic pre-conditioning (RIPC) have suggested this intervention reduces complications of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary by-pass surgery. The aims of this work were to (i) conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of RIPC on cardiac and renal damage in patients undertaking elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); (ii) summarize the results in an evidence-based clinical context. We conducted a systematic search of published randomized controlled trials of RIPC for elective PCI up until May 1st, 2015. Studies of peri- or post-ischemic conditioning or emergency PCI were excluded. Nine studies, totalling 1253 patients were included. Compared to control, RIPC groups exhibited reduced peri-procedural myocardial infarction (MI) Odds Ratio (OR) 0.72 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.97, p = 0.03); ST-segment deviation OR 0.42 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.63, p < 0.0001); major adverse cardiac events (MACE) OR 0.41 (95% CI 0.21 to 0.84, p = 0.01); and acute kidney injury (AKI) OR 0.47 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.86, p = 0.01), but not mortality OR 1.00 (95% CI 0.27 to 3.73, p = 1.00). RIPC is likely to prevent major adverse cardiac and renal events in patients undertaking elective PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
King et al. (2016) conducted a meta-analysis in Elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n=1,253). Remote ischemic pre-conditioning (RIPC) vs. Control was evaluated on Peri-procedural myocardial infarction (MI) (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.97, p=0.03). Remote ischemic pre-conditioning reduced peri-procedural myocardial infarction (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.54-0.97; p=0.03) and major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing elective PCI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: