Key result
Remote ischaemic preconditioning fails to reduce perioperative MI during ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.
Why the study?
Remote ischaemic preconditioning was suggested to protect vital organs from reperfusion injury during major vascular surgery, but its effect on perioperative myocardial infarction during open surgery for ruptured AAA was unknown.
Does remote ischaemic preconditioning reduce perioperative myocardial infarction in patients undergoing open surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm?
RCT (n=200)
Open-label
1:1
Yes
Does remote ischaemic preconditioning reduce perioperative myocardial infarction in patients undergoing open surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm?
Absolute Event Rate: 36% vs 43%
Remote ischaemic preconditioning does not reduce perioperative myocardial infarction during open surgery for ruptured AAA, though it may reduce 30-day mortality.
Remote ischaemic preconditioning should not be used to prevent perioperative MI in ruptured AAA repair; confirms no benefit on primary endpoint in this RCT.
Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been suggested as a means of protecting vital organs from reperfusion injury during major vascular surgery. This study was designed to determine whether RIPC could reduce the incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction (MI) during open surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Secondary aims were to see if RIPC could reduce 30-day mortality, multiple organ failure, acute intestinal ischaemia, acute kidney injury and ischaemic stroke. This randomized, non-blinded clinical trial was undertaken at three vascular surgery centres in Denmark. Patients who had open surgery for ruptured AAA were randomized to intervention with RIPC or control in a 1 : 1 ratio. Postoperative complications and deaths were registered, and ECG and blood samples were obtained daily during the hospital stay. Of 200 patients randomized, 142 (72 RIPC, 70 controls) were included. There was no difference in rates of perioperative MI between the RIPC and control groups (36 versus 43 per cent respectively), or in rates of organ failure. However, in the per-protocol analysis 30-day mortality was significantly reduced in the RIPC group (odds ratio 0·46, 95 per cent c.i. 0·22 to 0·99; P = 0·048). RIPC did not reduce the incidence of perioperative MI in patients undergoing open surgery for ruptured AAA. Registration number: NCT00883363 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov). A novel randomized clinical trial of 200 patients undergoing open surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm showed no effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning of perioperative myocardial infarction, but a possible overall effect on 30-day mortality. No effect on MI but did lower mortality More support for nerve monitoring Little evidence yet of NPWT cost-effectiveness
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pedersen et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (n=200). Remote ischaemic preconditioning vs. No preconditioning was evaluated on Perioperative myocardial infarction. Remote ischaemic preconditioning did not reduce the incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction compared to control (36% vs 43%) during open surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: