Assessment shows enhanced photoelectric properties in MnOx nanocomposites, indicating potential for diverse applications.
Improving charge transport in the aggregated state of nanocomposites is challenging due to the large number of defects present at grain boundaries. To enhance the charge transfer and photogenerated carrier extraction of MnOx nanofibers, a MnOx/GO (graphene oxide) nanocomposite was prepared. The effects of GO content and bias on the optoelectronic properties were studied. Representative light sources at 405, 650, 780, 808, 980, and 1064 nm were used to examine the photoelectric signals. The results indicate that the MnOx/GO nanocomposites have photocurrent switching behaviours from the visible region to the NIR (near-infrared) when the amount of GO added is optimised. It was also found that even with zero bias and storage of the nanocomposite sample at room temperature for over 8 years, a good photoelectric signal could still be extracted. This demonstrates that the MnOx/GO nanocomposites present a strong built-in electric field that drives the directional motion of photogenerated carriers, avoids the photogenerated carrier recombination, and reflect a good photophysical stability. The strength of the built-in electric field is strongly affected by the component ratios of the resulting nanocomposite. The formation of the built-in electric field results from interfacial charge transfer in the nanocomposite. Modulating the charge behaviour of nanocomposites can significantly improve the physicochemical properties of materials when excited by light with different wavelengths and can be used in multidisciplinary applications. Since the recombination of photogenerated electron–hole pairs is the key bottleneck in multidisciplinary fields, this study provides a simple, low-cost method of tailoring defects at grain boundaries in the aggregated state of nanocomposites. These results can be used as a reference for multidisciplinary fields with low energy consumption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: