August 16, 2025Canadian Journal of Law & JurisprudenceOpen Access

Against Relational Justice

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

This critique argues against the plausibility of focusing on bilateral relationships in private law.
Key evidence shows that relational justice may overlook the importance of societal commitments to self-determination.
The approach involves recognizing that individual rights should be upheld on a societal scale rather than just reciprocally.
This perspective may encourage broader legal reforms to ensure equality and self-determination for all individuals.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Critical notice challenges the focus on bilateral relationships for ensuring self-determination and substantive equality in private law, suggesting a societal approach instead.

Cite This Study

Arie Rosen (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68a368780a429f797332d4b1 https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2025.10040

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Critical notice challenges the focus on bilateral relationships for ensuring self-determination and substantive equality in private law, suggesting a societal approach instead.

Against Relational Justice

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Against Relational Justice

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider