Observational analysis shows design-build improves cost efficiency in pipeline rehabilitation, indicating better project outcomes.
Pipeline rehabilitation projects often face significant challenges due to the unpredictable and unknown nature of existing conditions. Aging infrastructure, unclear documentation, and varying soil compositions are some of the factors that can complicate the rehabilitation process. These unknown conditions can often lead to project delays, increased costs, and safety concerns. The design-build (DB) method has emerged as a highly effective approach for pipeline rehabilitation projects, offering significant advantages over traditional project delivery methods. This integrated approach combines design and construction phases under a single contract, fostering enhanced collaboration and communication among stakeholders to provide turnkey solutions. By streamlining project timelines and reducing administrative burdens, the DB method can lead to overall cost savings and improved project efficiency, especially in emergency response scenarios. Additionally, the Design-Build Institute of America (DBIA) recently released an updated version of their best practices document, specifically focused on the water and wastewater market. With the early involvement of contractors in the design process, the DB method allows for innovative solutions and risk mitigation through value-engineered strategies tailored to the specific challenges of pipeline rehabilitation. This paper explores the benefits, challenges, and water/wastewater best practices associated with the design-build approach, drawing on case studies to highlight its potential for transforming pipeline rehabilitation projects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Best et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: