Retrospective study shows reduced phototherapy rates and improved follow-up in infants, indicating AAP guidelines may effectively alter management in middle-income countries.
Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (NH) is common and can cause neurological dysfunction. The AAP updated its guideline in 2022 to improve the management of NH, but its impact in middle-income countries with high NH and G6PD deficiency rates remains uncertain. This study evaluated the updated guidelines in such a setting. This retrospective study analyzed infants born in a Thai institution between January 2021-March 2022 (previous guidelines) and January 2023-March 2024 (updated guidelines). Infants <15 days receiving phototherapy or outpatient bilirubin testing were included, while those born <35 weeks, admitted to the NICU, congenital anomalies, or inborn errors of metabolism were excluded. The primary outcome was the phototherapy rate; secondary outcomes included exchange transfusion, readmissions, NH etiologies, bilirubin testing, hospital stay, and outpatient follow-up. Logistic regression identified associated factors. Among 3,607 infants, 463 met inclusion criteria. Phototherapy rates decreased with the updated guideline (14.9% to 11.5%, p = 0.003). Identification of infants with G6PD deficiency declined (16.5% vs 7.3%, p = 0.004), with affected infants having lower odds of receiving phototherapy under the updated guidelines (adjust OR = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.21-0.76, p = 0.005). Readmission rates (6.6% vs 5.5%, p = 0.43), hospital stay, and bilirubin testing showed no significant differences. Outpatient follow-up improved, with more infants requiring only one visit and receiving earlier follow-up. The updated AAP guidelines were associated with reduced phototherapy use and follow-up visits, with a stable readmission rate. Further research is needed to assess their impact on G6PD-related outcomes in middle-income countries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vongbhavit et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: