August 16, 2025

The efficacy of personalization within psychological treatments compared to no or less personalization: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

SHSusan J. HarnasAmsterdam University Medical Centers KFKim F FranckenDutch Cancer Society FMFabiola MüllerUniversity Medical Center Groningen

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Meta-analysis finds no significant improvement in treatment outcomes for personalized psychological therapies, indicating wider implications for mental health strategies.

Key Points

No significant improvement in treatment outcomes for personalized psychological treatments compared to less personalized ones, showing limited efficacy in current practices.
The pooled standardized mean difference for symptoms was 0.07, and for treatment outcomes, it was 0.29, indicating minimal impact of personalization on results.
Meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials revealed minimal evidence suggesting personalization enhances treatment effectiveness.
The findings call for further research to explore clinically relevant levels of personalization across diverse mental health treatments.

Cite This Study

Harnas et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68a368780a429f797332d790 https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000964

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Meta-analysis finds no significant improvement in treatment outcomes for personalized psychological therapies, indicating wider implications for mental health strategies.

The efficacy of personalization within psychological treatments compared to no or less personalization: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

The efficacy of personalization within psychological treatments compared to no or less personalization: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider