Demonstrates that a zinc/silver-based method accurately analyzes sulfur isotopes in low H2S concentrations, suggesting a safer alternative to cadmium.
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) sulfur stable isotope ratio (δ34S) analyses use cadmium (Cd) or zinc (Zn) solutions; however, Cd is toxic, and Zn does not display an obvious change in color at low molar H2S inputs. This study (i) developed a non-toxic, colorimetric mixed zinc/silver (Zn/Ag)-based method and (ii) evaluated the minimum H2S input required for analysis. Gaseous H2S was trapped using the Cd- and Zn/Ag-based methods and converted to solid silver sulfide (Ag2S). δ34S stable isotope analysis was completed using elemental analysis-isotope ratio mass spectrometry (EA-IRMS). H2S, from 8.4 × 10-6 mol up to 1.0 × 10-4 mol, was trapped using the Cd- and Zn/Ag-based methods. The Zn/Ag-based method retained stable δ34S values at lower molar inputs than the Cd-based method. Environmental sampling had a usable detection range of approximately 4.1 × 10-4-7.8 × 10-1 mol/m3 (~10-19 000 ppm). The mean δ34S difference between methods was -0.1‰, ranging from -3.0‰ to +3.1‰, with 23 out of 27 samples falling within ±1.2‰. The Zn/Ag-based method produced δ34S values comparable with the Cd-based method and maintained accuracy with lower molar inputs of H2S. The minimum molar input for analysis is ~8.4 × 10-6 mol. The Zn/Ag method is safer for human health and the environment, and a suitable alternative to Cd for H2S trapping and subsequent δ34S determination by IRMS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ure et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: