The scientific community finds ways to defend democracy and freedom of expression against authoritarianism.
The United States' democratic leadership, commitment to freedom of expression, and investment in the pursuit of knowledge have long enabled its preeminence in science and technology. Yet today we are witnessing what happens to a nation's science and technology enterprise when democratic principles and the rule of law are ignored. The US scientific community is well-suited to play a leading role in pushing back, drawing inspiration from historical cases that have been effective. Building alternative institutions outside of government that reduce reliance on the authoritarian regime, lessen its power and relevance over day-to-day life, and preserve sites of independent thought can be vital both in preserving science and in defending democracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goldman et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: