Qualitative study explores end-of-life care challenges for dementia patients in long-term care, highlighting key roles of healthcare providers.
To explore surrogate decision-making practices regarding end-of-life care for people with dementia in Korean long-term care hospitals from the perspective of healthcare providers. A qualitative descriptive study. The data were collected through individual semi-structured interviews with 24 healthcare providers (physicians, oriental medicine doctors, registered nurses and social workers) involved in dementia end-of-life care in their current long-term care hospitals in South Korea. The data were analysed using a conventional content analytic technique. The analysis yielded three categories and nine subcategories describing surrogate decision-making practices regarding end-of-life care for people with dementia: (a) typical circumstances of end-of-life care planning, (b) expected roles of key personnel and related challenges and (c) important considerations. Participants discussed available treatment options within long-term care hospitals and the potential transfers to acute care hospitals during admission and periods of health decline. Physicians typically led such end-of-life care planning, with nurses playing a supportive role and family members making the final decisions. However, they faced challenges in performing their roles. In end-of-life care discussions, participants weighed the patients' autonomy and best interests alongside family members' interests and other external concerns such as potential lawsuits and insufficient medical resources. Surrogate decision-making regarding end-of-life care in the context of dementia within long-term care hospitals is considerably complex and challenging for healthcare providers, requiring multifaceted institution-sensitive support. The study findings suggest the need for targeted education and training to enhance healthcare providers' competencies in end-of-life care discussions, advance care planning and the development of policies and regulations supporting end-of-life care-related practices within long-term care hospitals. This study was reported in accordance with the COREQ checklist. No patient or public contribution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: