Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparison of machine learning models shows improved prediction of payment probability across arrear stages, highlighting their efficiency.
In credit risk, scoring models based on logistic regression have been developed to optimize the default risk assessment. However, these models require complex feature engineering and their accuracy worsens as the arrear progresses. This study proposes the use of machine learning techniques (XGBoost and Artificial Neural Networks) to generate scores in different arrear segments (No Arrears Segment, Segment 1-30 days of arrears, Segment 31-90 days of arrears, and All Segments). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) metric is used to assess the efficiency and predictive power of the models. To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the models, a five-step methodology is employed. It starts with the formulation of the problem, followed by the selection of a data sample and definition of the target variable, then a descriptive analysis of the data is performed to facilitate the data cleaning. Subsequently, the models are trained and tested, and finally, the results are analyzed and the models obtained are interpreted. The results show that both XGBoost and Artificial Neural Networks models outperform logistic regression in most of the arrears segments. In the No Arrears Segment, XGBoost model is the best with KS=63.36%. In the Segment 1-30, XGBoost is also the best with KS=51.38%. In the Segment 31-90, Artificial Neural Networks model is the best with KS=38.77%. Finally, with all segments of arrears, XGBoost model again is the best with KS=74.05%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sánchez et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: