Philosophical analysis resolves the inconsistency in Aristotle's metaphysics on differentia and genus, suggesting analogy helps clarify species relations.
There seems to be an inconsistency at the heart of Aristotle’s Metaphysics: a differentia is said both to presuppose its genus (in vii 12) and to be logically independent from it (in x 7). I argue that the relation of analogy resolves this inconsistency, restores the coherence of the concepts of differentia and species, and gives x 7 its rightful place in the development of the Metaphysics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicolas Zaks (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: