Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 17, 2025Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi.

The Authority of the Prosecutor in Conducting Investigations into Corruption Crimes According to Law Number 16 of 2004

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

RDReyza DarfebryantoUniversitas Dharmas IndonesiaEMElwidarifa MarwennyUniversitas Dharmas IndonesiaEFEngrina FauziUniversitas Dharmas Indonesia

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Analysis shows prosecutor authority under Law Number 16 of 2004 significantly impacts corruption investigations, indicating challenges from overlapping jurisdictions.

Key Points

  • Investigative authority defined under Law Number 16 of 2004 strengthens prosecutors' role in tackling corruption crimes.
  • Prosecutors face challenges from jurisdictional overlap, complicating their ability to investigate effectively.
  • The study utilizes empirical and normative legal methods, gathering data through interviews and statutes to understand the authority dynamics.
  • Regulatory challenges highlight the need for clear definitions and better cooperation among law enforcement agencies dealing with corruption.

Cite This Study

Darfebryanto et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68a36a360a429f797332e405https://doi.org/10.69989/0t37j034
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share