Observational analysis shows managerial overconfidence reduces environmental information disclosure in firms, suggesting external governance can mitigate this effect.
This paper investigates whether and how managerial overconfidence affects firms’ environmental information disclosure. Using 32,191 firm-year observations from Chinese companies between 2008 and 2022, the study finds that managerial overconfidence negatively impacts environmental information disclosure. These results remain robust across various tests, including alternative overconfidence measures, instrumental variable regressions, and propensity score matching. Mechanism analysis reveals that overconfidence reduces disclosure through overestimation of risk control ability and underestimation of stakeholder importance. Further analysis shows that external governance pressures from government regulation, media scrutiny, and institutional investor monitoring effectively mitigate this negative impact, while also confirming the value relevance of environmental information disclosure and the moderating role of managerial overconfidence. This study clarifies the influence and mechanisms of managerial overconfidence on environmental disclosure in developing countries, highlighting the role of external oversight.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: