Randomised controlled trial reduced insulin requirements and improved muscle strength in children with type 1 diabetes, suggesting a valuable mHealth intervention.
Objective: To evaluate the effects of resistance training supported by the mHealth-application Diactive-1 on the daily insulin dose and glycaemic parameters in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Research Design and Methods: In this 24-week randomised clinical trial, Diactive-1 generated progressive overload resistance training sessions tailored to real-time glycaemia and provided educational support. Insulin and glycaemic parameters were collected from LibreView or CareLink, whereas glycosylated haemoglobin was extracted from medical records. Muscle strength was assessed using a handgrip dynamometer and e-GYM machines, targeting pushing, pulling, and lower-limb movements. The effect was analysed using linear mixed models. Results. Sixty-two participants (age: 8–18 years, girls: 48%) with type 1 diabetes (HbA1c: 7.6 [60.4 mmol/mol]) were allocated to either the usual-care (n=32) or the Diactive-1 group (n=30). Daily insulin dose reductions were observed within Diactive-1 group (mean difference [MD]=-0.10 U/kg, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.18 to -0.01), and when was compared to usual-care (MD=-0.17 U/kg, 95%CI -0.26 to -0.07). No adverse effects were observed on either the glycaemic-risk index or the incidence of hypoglycaemic events. Finally, handgrip strength (MD=2.90, 95%CI: 1.57 to 4.22), one-repetition maximum strength (MD=1.34, 95%CI: 0.21 to 2.46), and muscle power (MD=0.97, 95%CI: 0.01 to 1.93) increased. Four participants (6.5%) withdrew from the study Conclusions: Diactive-1 appears to be a safe and feasible adjunct to standard care in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Its resistance training component effectively reduced insulin requirements and improved muscle strength, without increasing the risk of adverse glycaemic events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muñoz‐Pardeza et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: