Numerical model reveals erosion patterns and flow characteristics in ultra-high-pressure gas nozzles, suggesting design improvements.
To accommodate the extreme thermodynamic effects and erosion damage in throttling equipment for ultra-high-pressure natural gas wells (175 MPa), a coupled multiphase flow erosion numerical model for nozzles was established. This model incorporates a real gas compressibility factor correction and is based on the renormalized k-ε RNG (Renormalization Group k-epsilon model, a turbulence model that simulates the effects of vortices and rotation in the mean flow by modifying turbulent viscosity) turbulence model and the Discrete Phase Model (DPM, a multiphase flow model based on the Eulerian–Lagrangian framework). The study revealed that the nozzle flow characteristics follow an equal-percentage nonlinear regulation pattern. Choked flow occurs at the throttling orifice throat due to supersonic velocity (Ma ≈ 3.5), resulting in a mass flow rate governed solely by the upstream total pressure. The Joule–Thomson effect induces a drastic temperature drop of 273 K. The outlet temperature drops below the critical temperature for methane hydrate phase transition, thereby presenting a substantial risk of hydrate formation and ice blockage in the downstream outlet segment. Erosion analysis indicates that particles accumulate in the 180° backside region of the cage sleeve under the influence of secondary flow. At a 30% opening, micro-jet impact causes the maximum erosion rate to surge to 3.47 kg/(m2·s), while a minimum erosion rate is observed at a 50% opening. Across all opening levels, the maximum erosion rate consistently concentrates on the oblique section of the plunger front. Results demonstrate that removing the front chamfer of the plunger effectively improves the internal erosion profile. These findings provide a theoretical basis for the reliability design and risk prevention of surface equipment in deep ultra-high-pressure gas wells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: