Fuzzy risk allocation decision model enhances risk management in Nigerian mass housing projects, suggesting improved transparency and equitable risk-sharing.
Public–Private Partnership (PPP) procurement is a relatively new approach in Nigeria’s housing sector. This study introduces a Fuzzy Risk Allocation Decision Model (FRADM) designed to address the complex and subjective nature of risk allocation in PPP-procured Mass Housing Projects (MHPs). A structured quantitative approach involving 40 purposively selected PPP housing experts was employed. Using a fuzzy synthetic evaluation (FSE) technique, critical risk factors were assessed based on partners’ risk management capabilities and allocation criteria. Constants (Ci) normalized the risk-carrying capacity indices (RCCIs) of both public and private sectors. Results show that risk attitude ranks highest among nine allocation criteria (MIS = 6.21), with the private sector demonstrating higher overall risk management capability. For instance, the availability of finance risk is optimally shared 53.48% to the private and 46.52% to the public sector. The FRADM was validated as reliable, practical, and replicable. Implications point to enhanced transparency, equitable risk-sharing, and support for SDG 11. The model is a strategic tool for decision-makers in PPP housing delivery in Nigeria and can inform similar efforts in other emerging economies. Further research should examine applications across other infrastructure sectors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arijeloye et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: