Analysis reveals that prestressing CFRP significantly improves axial compression in reinforced concrete columns, highlighting optimal design parameters for efficiency.
Current research primarily focuses on using CFRP materials to strengthen small or medium-sized test specimens. To address this, our study employed ABAQUS software to analyze the axial compression behavior of large-scale reinforced concrete (RC) columns strengthened with prestressed carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) sheets. We conducted comparative analyses on key parameters: the prestress level applied to the CFRP, the width of CFRP strips, the spacing between strips, the confinement ratio, and the overall load–displacement curves of the columns. The results demonstrate that applying prestress significantly improves the efficiency of stress transfer in the CFRP sheet, effectively mitigating the stress lag phenomenon common in traditional CFRP strengthening, leading to a substantially enhanced strengthening effect. The CFRP wrapping method critically impacts performance: increasing the confinement ratio enhanced ultimate load capacity by 21.8–59.9%; reducing the strip spacing increased capacity by 21.8–50.4%; and widening the strips boosted capacity by 38.7–58%. Although full wrapping achieved the highest capacity increase (up to 73.2%), it also incurred significantly higher costs. To ensure the required strengthening effect while optimizing economic efficiency and CFRP material utilization, the strip wrapping technique is recommended. For designing optimal reinforcement, priority should be given to optimizing the confinement ratio first, followed by adjusting strip width and spacing. Proper optimization of these parameters significantly enhances the strengthened member’s ultimate load capacity, ductility, and energy dissipation capacity. This study enriches the theoretical foundation for prestressed CFRP strengthening and provides an essential basis for rationally selecting prestress levels and layout parameters in engineering practice, thereby aiding the efficient design of strengthening projects for structures like bridges, with significant engineering and scientific value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lv et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: