Systematic review identifies mediators and moderators of happiness at work, suggesting pathways to improve employee well-being.
This study presents a systematic literature review of happiness at work (HAW), offering a comprehensive understanding of the current state of research. Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for article inclusion and the Theory, Context, Characteristics and Methodologies (TCCM) framework for future research directions, the study synthesizes the fragmented body of HAW literature. It develops a conceptual model that incorporates various antecedents, mediators, moderators and outcomes of workplace happiness. Key findings highlight underexplored areas, such as remote work and technostress. This study provides actionable insights to enhance both employee well-being and organizational performance, contributing significantly to the field of workplace happiness and well-being.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharma et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: