This research translates and evaluates the working alliance inventory in psychotherapy, indicating valid assessment in Russian clients.
Context and relevance. The article is devoted to the primary adaptation of the WAI-S (Working Alliance Inventory — Short; Inventory of the Working Alliance — Abbreviated version) measurement methodology in a Russian-speaking sample. A therapeutic alliance is a specific relationship that is formed between a psychologist and a client in the process of psychotherapy and counseling, and is also related to the effectiveness of psychotherapy. Today, there are no adapted tools for measuring the alliance in the psychologist-client dyad in Russian. Goal. This study is aimed at translating, adapting, and evaluating the psychometric characteristics of WAI-S. Objective. This study is aimed at translating, adapting, and evaluating the psychometric characteristics of WAI-S. Hypothesis. The translated and adapted WAI-S methodology will have sufficient psychometric validity characteristics to use the work alliance assessment. Methods and materials. The study included a single slice after 4 meetings between the client and therapist, using a short version of WAI-S (Working Alliance Inventory-S) and the Session Rating Scale (SRS, Session Rating Scale, Miller, Duncan, & Johnson, 2002) to assess the approximate validity. The study involved 226 clients with an average age of 24.23 (min = 18, max = 58, mod = 21), and 228 questionnaires filled out by psychotherapists, 24 unique therapists (average age = 36, min = 22, max = 74, mod = 25). Results. The analysis showed high rates of internal consistency of the scales, a one-factor structure of the methodology was obtained in both the psychotherapist and client versions. Conclusions. The results of the study indicate the validity of the one-factor version of WAI-S and its suitability for use in Russian psychological research and practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khlomov et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: