Mixed-methods analysis reveals challenges and tools in data management for M&E professionals across Africa, suggesting ways to improve practices.
This study offers a comprehensive examination of Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) data management practices across the continent, drawing on the perspectives of 158 professionals from 16 African countries, with work experience spanning 32 countries on the continent. Using a mixed-methods approach, data were collected via an online survey disseminated through regional professional networks. Findings reveal widespread adoption of digital tools for data collection and storage, moderate use of statistical software, and growing awareness of data quality, access, and security. However, persistent challenges, such as limited integration across systems, weak metadata practices, underutilization of data for decision-making, and gaps in institutional capacity, undermine the effectiveness of M&E systems. Funding constraints, skills shortages, and technological limitations were identified as major barriers. Despite these issues, respondents offered practical recommendations to strengthen M&E data systems, including investments in digital infrastructure, capacity building, and the development of standardized protocols. The study provides timely insights to inform policy, enhance data-driven development, and foster a stronger M&E culture across Africa.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Isaack Michael Nguliki (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: