Field tests evaluate jet fan ventilation efficiency in large-section tunnels, suggesting deflector shields enhance airflow.
The jet fan system is a widely adopted form of longitudinal ventilation due to its cost-effectiveness, operational flexibility, and high reliability. However, in large-section highway tunnels with a low height-to-span ratio, the limited clearance between the tunnel ceiling and surrounding structural boundaries imposes significant constraints on improving ventilation performance by adjusting the installation height or pitch angle of the jet fan. To address this limitation, this study proposes a deflector shield system to enhance the aerodynamic efficiency of jet fans. A total of thirteen test cases, including a control group, three deflector plate quantities, and four deflector pitch angles, were tested in a full-scale field test conducted in a large-section tunnel. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of the number and pitch angle of deflector plates on tunnel ventilation efficiency and to identify the optimal parameter combination for application in large-section tunnels. The results show that static pressure along the tunnel initially rises with distance from the fan, peaks, and then declines sharply. The pressure rise coefficient is significantly enhanced under several configurations, particularly with four deflector plates at 8° and 10° pitches, and with five plates at 4° to 10° pitches. When the number of deflector plates is five, a sharp drop in average wind speed is observed 15 m downstream of the fan, and extensive low-velocity regions appear further downstream. In contrast, the configurations with four deflector plates at 8° and 10° exhibit better wind speed uniformity in the downstream flow field. Considering both the pressure rise coefficient and wind speed uniformity, the optimal ventilation performance of the jet fan system is achieved with four deflector plates at a pitch angle of 8°.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: