Analysis predicts future built-up land cover in urban areas, suggesting CNNs are the most effective method.
We compare several methods for predicting future built-up land cover using only a short yearly time series of satellite-derived binary urban maps. Existing methods of built-up expansion forecasting often rely on ancillary datasets such as utility networks, distance to transportation nodes, and population density maps, along with remotely sensed aerial or satellite imagery. Such ancillary datasets are not always available and lack the temporal density of satellite imagery. Moreover, existing work often focuses on quantifying the expected volume of built-up expansion, rather than predicting where exactly that expansion will occur. To address these gaps, we evaluate six methods for the creation of prediction maps showing expected areas of future built-up expansion, using yearly built/not-built maps derived from Sentinel-2 imagery as inputs: Cellular Automata, logistic regression, Support Vector Machines, Random Forests, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), and CNNs with the addition of long short-term memory (ConvLSTM). Of these six, we find CNNs to be the best-performing method, with an average Cohen’s kappa score of 0.73 across nine study sites in the continental United States.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Neill et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: