This analysis challenges the traditional view of Suetonius' De viris illustribus, suggesting alternative hypotheses about its content and structure.
In this paper I argue that the accepted reconstruction of Suetonius’ De viris illustribus has been shaped by unexamined assumptions that have been allowed to take on the appearance of fact. I begin by surveying the scholarly reconstruction of this work from the fifteenth century until today. I then examine two key underlying assumptions: that Suetonius planned and published his series of literary lives as a single compendious work and that it excluded men who were not writers or wrote in Greek; in both cases I propose alternative hypotheses. I lastly test these alternatives by sketching a new approach to a possible Suetonian book De philosophis . I conclude that the more we rid ourselves of a priori assumptions about De viris illustribus , the more clearly we can see that Suetonius’ interests and approach were remarkably consistent throughout all his lives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. B. Rives (2025) studied this question.