This analysis compares fire dynamics of power cables with and without fire-resistant coating under varying heat fluxes, indicating significant findings for safety applications.
Cable fires are one of the primary causes of fire hazards in nuclear power plants (NPPs) and warehouse buildings. This paper presents a study on the experimental and numerical analysis of cable failure with and without fire-resistant coating. The experiments were conducted in two sets under two different average heat fluxes, ranging from 15 (13–15) kW/ m2 to 20 (17–20) kW/ m2 . A total of 10 experiments were analyzed, with five varying fire-resistant coating thicknesses from 0 to 0.8 mm for each heat flux value. For the power cable without coating, under an average heat flux value of 15 kW/ m2 , the failure time was recorded as 1,897 s. Furthermore, the core and outer sheath temperatures at the time of failure, under the same heat flux, were recorded as 282.60°C and 353.90°C, respectively. For the power cable without coating under a heat flux value of 20 kW/ m2 , the failure time was recorded as 991 s; the core and outer sheath temperatures at failure were recorded as 223.16°C and 310.16°C, respectively. Correlations for both heat fluxes were established, showing close agreement with experimental results—within a 2% variation. COMSOL Multiphysics software is used to perform the numerical simulations. The simulation results for the uncoated cable showed that under a heat flux value of 15 kW/ m2 , the failure time, core temperature, and outer sheath temperature were 1898 s, 333.37°C, and 361.83°C, respectively. Under a heat flux value of 20 kW/ m2 for a power cable without coating, the simulation results obtained for cable failure time, core temperature, and outer sheath temperature were found to be 990 s, 212.73°C, and 256.45°C, respectively. The absolute mean deviation for the outer sheath in numerical validation was 9.94%, while for the core, it was 14.19%. The simulation results show good agreement with the experimental results. These findings contribute to a better understanding of cable burning characteristics and failure times.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mishra et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: