This analysis reveals ambiguities in causal inference using causal Bayes nets, highlighting key limitations.
Some authors maintain that we can use causal Bayes nets to infer whether X → Y or X ← Y by consulting a probability distribution defined over some exogenous source of variation for X or Y . We raise a problem for this approach. Specifically, we point out that there are cases where an exogenous cause of X ( E x ) has no probabilistic influence on Y no matter the direction of causation—namely, cases where E x → X → Y and E x → X ← Y are probabilistically indistinguishable. We then assess the philosophical significance of this problem and discuss some potential solutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stern et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: