Retrospective cohort study reports treatment outcomes for colonic volvulus in 442 patients, indicating differences in management between caecum and sigmoid types.
Introduction Colonic volvulus mainly affects caecum (CV) and sigmoid colon (SV). This study described clinical characteristics and treatments in a modern cohort. Method A retrospective cohort study across the Swedish Southeast healthcare region (population 1.1 million) identified patients diagnosed with colonic volvulus 2010–2022 with review of medical records. Result In total, 442 patients with a first episode of colonic volvulus were included – 202 CV, 240 SV; none in other colon segments. The annual incidence was 3.26 per 100,000 (CV 1.77; SV 1.49), unaltered over the studied period. CV affected more women (65%) and younger patients (median 64.8 vs. 73.6 years (p<0.001)), while SV predominately affected men (79%, p<0.001). Prior abdominal surgery was more common in CV, whereas neurological and psychiatric conditions, constipation, and nursing home residency were more frequent in SV (p<0.05 for all). CV was treated with emergency surgery in 99%. First-line treatment of the first SV episode was mainly non-operative (contrast enema 78%, endoscopy 7%, spontaneous resolution 4%), successful in 82%. Emergency surgery was first-line treatment in 11% and second-line in 13% (failed non-operative treatment). Among 152/53/21/16/10 patients treated without emergency or elective surgery for a first/second/third/fourth/fifth SV episode, increasing recurrence rates of 62%/77%/90%/88%/100% were observed (p for trend <0.001). The 90-day mortality after emergency surgery was 6% for CV and 13% for SV (p=0.89), and 6% after elective SV surgery (p=0.25). Discussion Initial therapy is normally surgery in CV and non-operative in SV. The risk of recurrence increases with each SV episode, why elective surgery should be considered after recurrent SV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hussein et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: